CRC Adds Its Voice to New Rule Ending the Dues Skim
Washington, DC (August 9, 2018)—Today the Capital Research Center submitted comments in support of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed rule to remove loopholes that allow…
Labor Watch
NY State Legislature Tries Circumventing SCOTUS
On June 27, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Mark Janus, an Illinois government worker who dissented from union representation and paying union fees, in the case of Janus…
Trade Union Bank Gets Into the “Dark Money” Game
There’s a new player in philanthropy, and it’s run by Big Labor’s bank of choice. Amalgamated Charitable Foundation is a new 501(c)(3) public charity that quietly opened its doors in…
Emphatic Victory for Worker Rights in Janus Ruling
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court finally handed down its ruling in the Janus v. AFSCME case, which challenged the ability of government worker unions to force dissenting nonmembers…
The Babysitters’ Union: A Big Idea for the AFT
The Babysitters’ Union (full series) A Big Idea for the AFT| Organizing the Organizers| Using Political Muscle | Time for the Vote Editor’s…
The Babysitters’ Union: Organizing the Organizers
The Babysitters’ Union (full series) A Big Idea for the AFT| Organizing the Organizers| Using Political Muscle | Time for the Vote Editor’s…
The Babysitters’ Union: Using Political Muscle
The Babysitters’ Union (full series) A Big Idea for the AFT| Organizing the Organizers| Using Political Muscle | Time for the Vote Editor’s…
The Babysitters’ Union: Time for the Vote
The Babysitters’ Union (full series) A Big Idea for the AFT| Organizing the Organizers| Using Political Muscle | Time for the Vote Editor’s…
Capital Research Center Applauds Janus Decision
WASHINGTON, DC (June 27, 2018)—Today the Capital Research Center praised the decision by the United States Supreme Court, which expressly overturned existing case law that permitted the collection of mandatory agency…
A Setback for Big Labor’s Legal Attack Dog
In a blow to the Left, the Supreme Court ruled 5-to-4 in Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute to uphold Ohio’s rule removing infrequent voters from its voter rolls.