Undercover video: Democrats caused violence at Trump rallies


This week our friend James O’Keefe III at Project Veritas Action began releasing a series of undercover videos with shocking information about left-wing nonprofits — 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) groups — that appear to have been behind the Left’s well-organized false flag operation against the Donald Trump campaign.

Worse, those nonprofits appear to have been illegally collaborating with the Hillary Clinton campaign to pay people to show up at Trump campaign rallies and initiate physical altercations. The goal was to make it appear that Trump supporters were knuckle-dragging thugs in order to discredit Trump’s candidacy.

As Joel Pollak noted in a prescient column at Breitbart News on Aug. 10, the Left believes:

creating violence is a no-lose strategy. If protesters can provoke Trump supporters to be violent, they embarrass Trump and cast him as a fascist. And if the protesters themselves are violent, voters will understand that a Trump victory will be met with violent mob resistance.

The left has recruited some Beltway Republicans — the NeverTrump faction — as a willing echo chamber for this meme. Mere hours before the San Jose riot, David French — then considering a third-party run for president to undermine Trump and give the election to Hillary Clinton — accused Trump of inciting violence.

Trump’s primary opponents, too, blamed Trump for the riot that closed down his Chicago rally in April — rather than blaming the organized left-wing groups that created the chaos.

It is not news to those who follow the activist Left that these people commit these kind of acts, but to have up-close-and-personal video footage of senior Clinton operatives acknowledging — even bragging — about using mentally ill people to start fights at Trump rallies is another thing altogether.

CRC vice president Matthew Vadum immediately wrote a long report on the first video for FrontPage Magazine, including thorough histories of the radicals who run the nonprofits involved (warning: harsh language from the activists). The radicals’ backgrounds include heading unions like the American Federation of Teachers, AFSCME (American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees), and SEIU (Service Employees International Union), as well as serving as high-level staff for the Sierra Club, pro-Hillary super PACs, People for the American Way, Center for American Progress, and Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev).


Share this post!

Venezuela embraces haute socialist cuisine: humans


In the workers’ paradise known as the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, prisoners have been eating each other.

As Breitbart News reports

The parents of multiple late prisoners in the western state of Táchira, Venezuela, say the government did nothing to stop a notorious cannibal from killing and eating their children – and forcing other prisoners to eat human flesh or face the same fate.

The cases do not appear to be a product of the growing threat of famine in the socialist nation, though prisoners in many prisons have reportedly resorted to killing and eating stray cats to survive. Instead, it appears the government has done nothing to contain the perverse behavior of a prisoner known as “The People-Eater,” who is believed to have killed and eaten 40 people before being arrested.

“More than 40 prisoners attacked him,” Carlos Herrera, father of prisoner Juan Carlos Herrera, told reporters this week. “They stabbed him and hung him to bleed him out. Mr. Dorancel, known as ‘The People-Eater,’ was the one who butchered him to feed him to all the prisoners in the Táchira prison.” Dorancel Vargas is currently serving a prison sentence for cannibalism.

“Whoever did not do it [eat the flesh]… would be beaten, their fingers would be cut off, their legs broken, lungs perforated, they would have their heads smashed in with hammers,” Herrera continued. “It was atrocious and disastrous what those people lived in there.”

So it’s true that the revolution eventually eats its own.

Share this post!

Twitter delenda est


Twitter proves once again that it is a rotten organization that suppresses views with which it disagrees.

Twitter locked investigative journalist James O’Keefe III of Project Veritas out of his account for a ridiculous reason.

According to Project Veritas:

After releasing two viral videos over the last two days, Project Veritas Founder and President James O’Keefe is no longer allowed to access his Twitter account. According to Twitter, he is blocked from accessing his account for twelve hours, at which point they reserve the right to make him pass additional hurdles to access his account.

On Tuesday, O’Keefe released a video which shows Manhattan Democratic Election Commissioner Alan Schulkin admitting that voter fraud does indeed exist.

On Wednesday, O’Keefe released a video which shows a male Hillary Clinton staffer stating: “To be fired I would have to grab Emma’s [female coworker] ass twice and she would have to complain about it, I would have to sexually harass someone.”

The second video also showed the campaign worker stating that he could rip up Republican voter registration forms and not be reprimanded.

O’Keefe received an email from Twitter at 7:59 PM EST on October 12, 2016 stating the following:

Hi James O’Keefe,
Your account @JamesOKeefeIII has been locked.

Please go to Twitter now to fix the issue with your account.

Following the link provided by Twitter only took O’Keefe to their rules page but didn’t offer any additional helpful information.


This is not only hypocrisy — Twitter allows pornographic images and videos showing actual sexual activities — it is digital fascism.

Twitter is openly, unabashedly partisan.

Our May 2016 Foundation Watch by Lane Davis and Milo Yiannopoulos examined how Twitter and other social media enforce left-wing ideology. The primary funder of this evil is the left-wing John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

Twitter’s days are numbered.

Share this post!

California has Planned Parenthood’s back


The abortion-obsessed left-wingers in California’s government don’t forgive and forget.

On September 30 Gov. Jerry Brown (D) signed into law an oddball measure that outlaws the dissemination of secret recordings with health care providers, the Washington Times reports.

The legislation is a direct response to the Center for Medical Progress video series, which captured top Planned Parenthood officials discussing the trade of fetal body parts with undercover investigators. But David Daleiden, who heads the CMP, said the law shouldn’t apply to his work.

“The Center for Medical Progress never recorded ‘confidential’ communications, so California’s existing recording law and the new distribution provision are simply inapplicable to our work,” Mr. Daleiden said in a statement. “However, it is clear that Planned Parenthood does not want to be held accountable to the public whose taxpayer money it gladly takes by the hundreds of millions, and will even attack freedom of speech and the freedom of the press in order to maintain its own arbitrary levels of secrecy.”

So much for First Amendment speech protections in the Golden State.


Jeanne Mancini, president of the March for Life, profiled Planned Parenthood in the October 2015 issue of Organization Trends.

Share this post!

The Brocktopus may be illegally coordinating with Clinton campaign

David Brock, founder of Correct the Record, speaks at the Clinton School of Public Service in Little Rock, Ark., Tuesday, March 25, 2014. (AP Photo/Danny Johnston)

A hacked document published by Wikileaks shows what could constitute illegal coordination between Hillary Clinton’s campaign and groups run by left-wing slime merchant and admitted serial liar David Brock.

The leak came after the Campaign Legal Center filed a legal complaint with the Federal Election Commission accusing the Clinton campaign of unlawfully illegally coordinating its activities with Correct the Record, a super PAC that is part of the notorious Brocktopus. (The neologism refers to Brock’s ultra-sleazy network of activist organizations including the vile Media Matters for America.)

Correct the Record, a rapid response team created expressly to help Hillary, reportedly gave almost $6 million in in-kind donations to the campaign that took the form of coordinated expenditures which might violate federal law. The PAC vowed to spend $1 million for “push back” against users posting negative comments about Clinton on the social media sites Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, and Instagram.

The leaked emails paint quite a picture.

As the Washington Free Beacon reports:

Campaign staffers have discussed sharing fundraising information with Priorities USA, the most prominent Super PAC on the Democratic side, courting potential Priorities donors, and having Clinton personally thank high-dollar contributors, according to emails to and from campaign chairman John Podesta and another campaign staffer.

Most of the emails were posted on the website Wikileaks after hackers breached Podesta’s personal email account. U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies believe that the hackers responsible for the breach are taking directions from high-level Russian government officials.

Brocktopus arm Priorities USA, another super PAC, has gone through $130 million promoting Hillary and other Democrat candidates in the current election cycle.

Donors to Priorities USA include George Soros, Jim Simons, Fred Eychaner, Donald Sussman, Haim Saban, and Daniel Abraham.


Share this post!

Oh yes, the Left does prosecute its enemies


After GOP candidate Donald Trump vowed to seek prosecution of Democrat Hillary Clinton should he become president, the professional Left melted down.

Trump was prominently labeled a would-be dictator who would turn America into a banana republic (something the Obama administration has largely already accomplished by undermining the rule of law).

But the Left criminalizes politics and public policy differences all the time.

Up-and-coming reporter Bre Payton of the Federalist website provided the proof coming up with 16 examples of left-wingers trying — and in some cases succeeding — in putting their adversaries in jail. It is a hard-hitting article worthy of your attention.

Here’s the top of the piece:

During Sunday night’s presidential debate, Donald Trump quipped that if he were elected president, Hillary Clinton would be in jail for illegally using an unsanctioned private email server — which was housed in a bathroom and less secure than a Gmail account — to disseminate classified information during her tenure as secretary of State.

The media had a fainting spell over Trump’s comment, and are insisting he’s behaving like a dictator and threatening to jail a political opponent. Here’s a few of the numerous overwrought headlines that have emerged.

Vox: “Donald Trump’s threat to imprison Hillary Clinton is a threat to democracy”

The New Yorker: “Trump Shows His Inner Dictator”

CNN: “Trump threatens to jail Clinton if he wins election”

ThinkProgress:”Trump campaign can’t decide whether Trump was joking about putting Hillary in jail”

They seem to be forgetting that throwing the book at one’s political opponents is what Democrats do all the time. Here’s 16 times Democrats tried to prosecute their opponents for political gain, not justice.
I can’t reproduce the rest of the article but here are the names of the 16 parties affected:

1. David Daleiden of the Center for Medical Progress (for undercover Planned Parenthood footage about that nonprofit’s thriving baby organ-harvesting business)

2. Little Sisters of the Poor (for refusing on religious faith grounds to provide birth control to their employees)

3. Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder (R)

4. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) and his supporters

5. Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R)

6. Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell (R)

7. “Climate change deniers”

8. Mitt Romney

9. advocates for sex-protected bathrooms

10. cake bakers

11. conservative nonprofits such as True the Vote

12. author and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza

13. filmmaker Nakoula Basseley Nakoula

14. pro-lifers

15. Karl Rove

16. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Okla.)

I would make ACORN slayer James O’Keefe III number 17 on the list for the truly ridiculous politically motivated prosecution that came after his crew filmed video in Sen. Mary Landrieu’s (D-La.) office.
Separately, the left-wingers at a group called Velvet Revolution demanded O’Keefe, his fellow journalist Hannah Giles, and the late Internet news publisher Andrew Breitbart be prosecuted for the 2009 undercover video sting operation that killed ACORN.


Share this post!

Soros Money Weakened Homeland Security Policies


John Rossomando of the Investigative Project on Terrorism has an excellent article on how America-hating billionaire George Soros has used his money to undermine U.S. national security.

Documents published by DC Leaks show that through his philanthropy, Open Society Foundations (OSF), Soros spent “$40 million between 2008 and 2010 on programs aimed at weakening U.S. counterterrorism policy,” Rossomando writes.

Muslim Advocates’ executive director Farhana Khera coauthored a 2007 memo urging OSF to create the National Security and Human Rights Campaign. The NSHRC was in fact created and it pushed to shutter the terrorist detention center in Guantanamo Bay, end extraordinary rendition programs, and shut down secret prisons, among other things. Muslim Advocates is an offshoot of the National Association of Muslim Lawyers.

OSF budgeted $21 million for NSHRC from 2008 to 2010 and kicked in an extra $1.5 million in 2010, according to documents released by DC Leaks. OSF gave it another $26 million to cover 2011 to 2014. NSHRC took in a matching $20 million donation from Atlantic Philanthropies. OSF made 105 grants totaling $20,052, 784 to 63 organizations under the NSHRC program.

A funders’ roundtable created by OSF in 2008 helped coordinate the grant making
among several left­-leaning foundations, ” in order to “dismantle the flawed ‘war on terror’ paradigm on which national security policy is now based.” At least “two
dozen” foundations participated in the roundtable’s strategy sessions as of the end of 2008.

Read the whole article here.

Share this post!

Assaulted female Chicago cop experienced the Ferguson effect


A female Chicago police officer said she allowed herself to be severely beaten because she didn’t want to use her gun and be placed under the media microscope, according to ABC News 7 in Chicago.

The policewoman was responding to a car crash on the city’s West Side “where officers encountered a man that police allege was violent and under the influence of drugs.” Three officers were hospitalized after the incident.

“One officer who was severely beaten told [Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson] she was afraid for her life and afraid to use lethal force with all of the attention on the police department’s previous actions and fatal incidents.”

“She thought she was going to die. She knew that she should shoot this guy, but she chose not to, because she didn’t want her family or the department to have to go through the scrutiny the next day on national news,” Johnson said.

The identity and race of the officer were not released so it is unclear if race played any role in the incident.

But cops’ reluctance to properly defend themselves is what has come to be called the “Ferguson effect.” Police officers are becoming increasingly reluctant to do their jobs and follow proper police procedure because they fear their actions will be characterized as examples of police brutality.

Manhattan Institute scholar Heather Mac Donald wrote this summer that the Ferguson effect is destroying Chicago.

Violence in Chicago is reaching epidemic proportions. In the first five months of 2016, someone was shot every 2¹/₂ hours and someone murdered every 14 hours, for a total of nearly 1,400 nonfatal shooting victims and 240 fatalities.

Over Memorial Day weekend, 69 people were shot, nearly one per hour, dwarfing the previous year’s tally of 53 shootings over the same period. The violence is spilling over from the city’s gang-infested South and West sides into the downtown business district; even Lake Shore Drive has seen drive-by shootings and robberies.

The growing mayhem is the result of Chicago police officers’ withdrawal from proactive enforcement, making the city a dramatic example of what I have called the “Ferguson effect.” […]

(photo source: https://submedia.tv/stimulator/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/furgeson_effect_Stim.jpg)

Share this post!

Charter schools and the struggle for progress: Why the NAACP has it wrong on the next chapter of the civil rights struggle


As much as I loathe linking to the disgusting website Salon, every once in a while it publishes a worthwhile article.

Such is “Charter schools and the struggle for progress: Why the NAACP has it wrong on the chapter of the civil rights struggle,” by Carrie Sheffield.

It begins:

During Tuesday’s vice presidential debate, Tim Kaine cited Barbara Johns, an African-American civil rights activist who led a walkout of her Farmville, Virginia high school to protest school segregation in 1951. Kaine said that walkout led to the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision striking down “separate but equal” doctrine.

More than 60 years later, the dream of educational equality is far from realized, and sadly the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), by considering a moratorium against charter schools, is now playing the role of obstructionist. Cheryl Brown Henderson, daughter of Oliver Brown, the plaintiff in Brown v. Board of Education, recently joined with CharterWorks, a campaign opposing the moratorium.

Launched September 21, the CharterWorks campaign is organized by the Black Alliance for Educational Options and the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools began with an initial press release explaining the campaign’s mission. On October 15, the NAACP will meet to finalize its decision on the moratorium. Brown Henderson is part of a group of hundreds of African-American leaders hoping to convince the NAACP to reconsider its decision.

For these pro-charter families, the current education system is failing and charter schools offer an alternative to the status quo. Many charter schools in urban areas — such as New Orleans, New York and Washington, D.C. — have seen improvement among students who struggled in previous learning environments. For them, and for their allies like myself, the charter school movement is the next chapter in the civil rights struggle.

Read the full article here.

Share this post!

Ben & Jerry’s goes full-on racist


Leftists Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield of Ben & Jerry’s ice cream have decided to alienate huge swaths of the population by embracing the ugly racism, cop-hatred, and terroristic violence of Black Lives Matter.

According to Truth Revolt, Ben & Jerry said in a statement that “systemic and institutionalized racism are the defining civil rights and social justice issues of our time” and that being silent about “the violence and threats to the lives and well-being of Black people is to be complicit in that violence and those threats.”

The two Vermont radicals say they have a “moral obligation” to take a stand. They deny they support a war on cops — wink wink.

The two aging ice cream moguls say:

We believe that saying Black lives matter is not to say that the lives of those who serve in the law enforcement community don’t. We respect and value the commitment to our communities that those in law enforcement make, and we respect the value of every one of their lives.

Truth Revolt opines “You cannot respect and value the lives of our law enforcement and simultaneously support the cop-killing message of the Black Lives Matter terrorists.”

Ben & Jerry continue:

But we do believe that — whether Black, brown, white, or blue — our nation and our very way of life is dependent on the principle of all people being served equal justice under the law. And it’s clear, the effects of the criminal justice system are not color blind.

Note that they spelled black with a capital B? It seems only racists do that.

South Burlington, Vermont-based Ben & Jerry’s Foundation can always be counted on to give money to bad causes.

Here are some of the awful left-wing groups the philanthropy has given grants to (according to IRS filings):

Center for Community Change ($75,000 since 2007)

Global Exchange ($265,000 since 2004)

Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement ($80,000 since 2007)

Praxis Project ($110,000 since 2008)

Rainforest Action Network ($25,000 since 2007)

People Organized to Win Employment Rights (POWER) ($62,000 since 2000)

Share this post!