Green Watch: A Gift to Bin Laden: Obama’s “rebuke to the terrorists” is actually what the terrorists have demanded

A Gift to Bin Laden
Obama’s “rebuke to the terrorists” is actually what the terrorists have demanded [PDF here]
By Steven J. Allen

Summary: After terrorists attacked Paris,
some security experts called for the postponement
of the world conference on “climate
change” that was to be held in that
city a few days later. But President Obama
said the conference, and the treaty then being
negotiated, would serve as a “rebuke”
to the terrorists. Now it’s clear that the opposite
is true: Global Warming theory is a
major component of Islamofascist ideology.
Osama bin Laden himself, in a letter “to the
American people” left behind when he was
killed, called on Americans to conduct “a
great revolution . . . to free Barack Husayn
[Obama] so he can implement the change
you seek . . . to save humanity from the harmful
gases that threaten its destiny.”

The recent terrorist assault on Brussels
was preceded by a related assault on
Paris. On November 13, terrorists
killed 130 people in a series of coordinated
attacks in Paris and its northern suburb,
Saint-Denis. The terrorists were from the
Islamic State (ISIS), a spinoff of Al Qaeda.

The 2015 U.N. Climate Change Conference,
at which officials were to finalize an
international agreement on Global Warming,
was scheduled to begin in Paris 17
days later. Some suggested postponing the
meeting, but President Obama would have
none of that: “What a powerful rebuke to
the terrorists it will be,” he said, “when the
world stands as one and shows that we will
not be deterred from building a better future
for our children.”

The conference went forward as planned
and, as its final product, produced a world
climate reparations program of the sort that
had been demanded by Al Qaeda’s late
founder, Osama bin Laden.

A powerful rebuke to the terrorists, indeed!

The root of terror
Some persons in the West claim Global
Warming causes terrorism like the Paris
attacks. ISIS supporters have a different
view, of course. They believe they’re fighting
for God. They believe that, as a prelude
to the ultimate battle between Christians
and Muslims, they have re-established the
caliphate (a government to which all Muslims
owe allegiance, ruled by a successor
to, and descendant of, Muhammad), in the
region that includes Dabiq—the Islamic
counterpart to Armageddon—where a
Muslim victory over the Christians will
mark the beginning of the end of the world.
This idea is so central to ISIS ideology that
the organization named its online magazine

According to the Left’s rhetoric, ISIS supporters
are ignorant about their own beliefs;
they may think they’re Muslims, but
they’re not, as the President and a former
Secretary of State keep claiming. (President
Obama: “Now let’s make two things clear:
ISIL [ISIS] is not Islamic. No religion
condones the killing of innocents, and the
vast majority of ISIL’s victims have been
Muslim. And ISIL is certainly not a state.”
And Secretary Clinton declared, “Muslims
are peaceful and tolerant people and have
nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism.”)
So, in the view of self-styled Progressives,
ISIS supporters are confused about their
identity. They just think they’re fulfilling
ancient prophecies and conquering the

Unconfused is Prince Charles who, a few
days after the Paris attacks, addressed the
issue, as reported by Reuters:

Britain’s Prince Charles has pointed
to the world’s failure to tackle climate
change as a root cause of the civil war

[Click HERE for the rest of the article.]

Share this post!